It all started with a sarcastic joke which is published in Sience Beauty, which I took from "Watts Up With That?" and that in a nutshell summed up in three vignettes the immaturity of the science of climate, lack of ethics of the scientists (and politicians) that maintain the official line of alarmism, and the inconsistencies in the conclusions that can get out of this gibberish.
Within minutes an avalanche of blog visits and the resulting flood of e fiercely criticizing the joke and of course towards me as editor of the blog. It is also true that I received many messages of support and sympathy especially to my response to the wildest messages. I've been answering all emails (as usual I do) and this has drawn criticism from regular readers of Science is Beauty, and so I've decided to end the debate there, and answer the remaining at this humble blog.
In short, I will answer here those emails that are in the queue and you all can always comment in this thread.